The FirmPractice AreasAttorneysRecognition
  Willman & Silvaggio
 
 
Practice Areas
Insurance Coverage

Willman & Silvaggio is uniquely qualified and experienced in commercial insurance coverage.  A significant portion of our insurance defense work has concentrated on the circumstances and needs of policy holders. We also have litigated or advised insurance companies in connection with commercial coverage disputes -- especially as it relates to policy obligations and bad faith claims – to minimize risk and to effectively resolve disputes.

Coverage Issues

The Insurance Coverage Group focuses on matters of insurance coverage litigation, particularly in matters arising out of underlying environmental, toxic tort and product liability claims. Our attorneys have been involved in representing primary as well as excess carriers in litigation before state and federal courts, as well as before arbitration panels and mediators. Willman & Silvaggio has represented carriers in some of the largest and most complex insurance coverage litigation in the country, including the defense of actions filed by Westinghouse, US Steel, PPG Industries, Corning, Kaiser, Halliburton and Federal Mogul.

Insurance companies routinely engage Willman & Silvaggio to represent their interests in complex high exposure coverage and extra-contractual disputes. Our Insurance Coverage Practice has extensive experience in a full range of commercial insurance coverage matters including threshold questions such as the definition of the policy holder, choice of law, trigger of coverage, timeliness of notice, application of exclusions, and allocation.  We recognize the large body of insurance coverage law nationally that consists of fact-sensitive and policy driven judicial opinions that may or may not provide guidance because of the differences in state law as well as the insurance contracts themselves.

Our experience in representing and defending policyholders and carriers has brought about relationships of mutual trust and respect between our firm and our clients. That guiding principle has enabled the firm to develop a broad based understanding of how this segment of the industry functions and an appreciation of the business and legal issues important to all of our clients. 

Our work on behalf of carriers for nearly 30 years enables us to provide effective counsel on questions of new areas of coverage and proposed policy language.  

Bad Faith

Legislation, regulation, and case law affecting the insurance industry are constantly evolving. These changes impact insurance companies in a variety of ways, including the definition of bad faith.  Our attorneys understand the bad faith claim process - how the claims develop, how claims handling techniques are best presented, and how judges and juries reach their verdicts and evaluate the claims process. This knowledge and experience enables us to work with insurance companies to develop effective preventative approaches while mounting aggressive defense strategies when necessary.





Related News
Pennsylvania Court Restricts Plaintiffs Ability to File Additional Suits for Asbestos-Related Conditions - 1/17/2008
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Decisions Clarifies Stacking Of Underinsured And Uninsured Coverage - 1/7/2008
Pennsylvania Federal Court Dismisses A Direct Action Against Insurer - 9/27/2007
Supreme Court of California Upholds Lower Court's Rejection of Discovery Requests for Reinsurance Information - 9/11/2007
Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Affirms Insurer Owes No Duty to Defend Because of Automobile Exclusion - 11/3/2006
Washington Federal Court Holds Property Damage Caused by Contractor Breach Cannot be "Occurrence" or "Accident" Under General Liability Policy - 10/19/2006
Specialized Forms of Insurance Small Businesses Should Consider to Protect Against Disaster - 10/19/2006
Federal Judge Upholds Bankruptcy Judge’s Denial of a Motion for Limited Modification of the Stay in an Insurance Coverage Adversary Proceeding - 10/16/2006
The US Supreme Court Refuses To Hear Two Asbestos Insurance Coverage Cases - 10/3/2006
Federal Judge Rules that Reserve Information is Protected and Not Discoverable; However Reinsurance Information May Not Have the Same Protection - 3/8/2006
Babcock & Wilcox Emerges From Bankruptcy - 2/23/2006
USG Corp. Announces that it has Resolved all Present and Future Asbestos Claims for $3.95 Billion - 1/30/2006
Fuller-Austin Decision is Reversed By California Appellate Court - 1/25/2006
Minnesota Jury Awards $52.5 Million for an Insurer's Failure to Defend Asbestos Law Suits - 12/14/2005
Insurers Have No Duty to Defend When Insured's Predecessor is Not Named in Underlying Suit - 12/2/2005
PA Supreme Court Rules MVFRL Bars the Owner from Recovering First-Party Benefits In Certain Situations - 10/11/2005
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Finds Full Tort Coverage For Children of Uninsured Motorists - 10/4/2005
Mississippi Sues Insurance Companies Seeking to Invalidate Flood Damage Exclusions - 9/19/2005
Stay Ordered in Coltec Industries, Inc. Coverage Case. - 5/17/2005

Related Articles
Rethinking Arbitration - 11/1/2006
Business Interrupted: Preventing Coverage Disputes - 8/14/2006
Courts Cracking Down on Establishments Serving Intoxicated Patrons - 11/3/2005

 
In this section:
Overview
Toxic and Mass Torts
Insurance Coverage
Defective Product Litigation
Civil Litigation
Business Planning and Transactions
Real Estate
 
Current Headlines
6/9/2010: Favorable Ruling Obtained by Willman & Silvaggio, LLP, Awarding Client Summary Judgment Based Upon the Expiration of the Statute of Limitations

On May 27, 2010, the PA Superior Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Common Pleas granting the defendant Mozart ...

5/31/2010: Willman & Silvaggio, LLP Obtains a Court ruling for the Elks Which Upholds an Important Common Law Principle

In a Per Curiam Order dated April 16, 2010, the Pa. Supreme Court denied an appeal by Richard Bisher, a member of the Scottsdale Elks Lodge No. 777, who sought recovery for injuries arising from a ...

6/11/2009: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reverses Defense Verdict in Products Liability Case Based on Error in Evidence Allowed at Trial

On June 1, 2009, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania reversed and remanded the defense verdict in the strict products liability case of Tara Guadio individually and as the administratrix of ...

 
Contact Us  |  One Corporate Center, 5500 Corporate Drive, Suite 150  Pittsburgh, PA 15237 | Phone: (412) 366-3333
© Copyright . All rights reserved.