The FirmPractice AreasAttorneysRecognition
  Willman & Silvaggio
 
 
Articles
Showing 1 through 5 of 10
Page 1 of 2 >> go to page
Court of Appeals of West Virginia reverses and remands summary judgment order in workers’ compensation deliberate intention action
6/14/2010

In a Per Curiam opinion dated June 2, 2010, the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia reversed and remanded the Circuit Court of Fayette County’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant R.M. Logging.  In doing so, the Supreme Court of Appeals believed that plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to create a question of fact regarding two contested elements of a deliberate intention action under the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act found at W. Va. Code § 23-4-2(d)(2)(ii).

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia Dismisses Deliberate Intent Claim of Employee Against Employer For Job-Related Injury
6/14/2010

On April 15, 2010, the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed the decision of the Circuit Court of Logan County granting the appellee’s motion for summary judgment.   The Court denied the appellant’s deliberate intent claim under West Virginia Code §23-4-2(d)(2)(ii) regarding a job-related injury.   

Unincorporated Associations: Can Members Sue for Personal Injuries?
3/15/2007
By James Young.  An analysis of whether members of unicorporated associations can sue the association under Pennsylvania law.
Rethinking Arbitration
11/1/2006
By Michael Katz and James Young.  Published by Claims Magazine.  Insurers and reinsurers who believe that the current system of reinsurance arbitration represents a more efficient way of resolving reinsurance claims find themselves at a disadvantage because of inequities and ambiguities in the U.S. system.  As a result, many questions are arising about the current practices in arbitration when instead there should be a greater emphasis on neutral, impartial arbitrators and more meaningful documentation of opinions.
Strategies and Defenses for Construction Personal Injury Claims
10/1/2006

By James Young.  Construction Executive, published by Associated Builders and Contractors.  Multiparty personal injury claims can involve considerable time and paperwork to sort out who is responsible for the plaintiff’s injuries. Construction company owners and managers can anticipate and prepare for such legal quagmires if they understand some common construction law principles and the nuances of indemnification agreements.

In this section:
The Firm
Careers
Articles
Link Library
News & Upcoming Events
 
Current Headlines
6/9/2010: Favorable Ruling Obtained by Willman & Silvaggio, LLP, Awarding Client Summary Judgment Based Upon the Expiration of the Statute of Limitations

On May 27, 2010, the PA Superior Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Common Pleas granting the defendant Mozart ...

5/31/2010: Willman & Silvaggio, LLP Obtains a Court ruling for the Elks Which Upholds an Important Common Law Principle

In a Per Curiam Order dated April 16, 2010, the Pa. Supreme Court denied an appeal by Richard Bisher, a member of the Scottsdale Elks Lodge No. 777, who sought recovery for injuries arising from a ...

6/11/2009: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reverses Defense Verdict in Products Liability Case Based on Error in Evidence Allowed at Trial

On June 1, 2009, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania reversed and remanded the defense verdict in the strict products liability case of Tara Guadio individually and as the administratrix of ...

 
Contact Us  |  One Corporate Center, 5500 Corporate Drive, Suite 150  Pittsburgh, PA 15237 | Phone: (412) 366-3333
© Copyright . All rights reserved.